Sunday, November 19, 2017
  Search 
Home
Opportunities
Partners
Publications
About Us
 
 
Please enter your email here, we would like to keep you informed.
 
 
Connect With Us - Facebook RSS
<November 2017>
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930
Sections
Liberty In The News
Liberty Events
Conference Proceedings
Culture
Agriculture
Democracy
Development is the Key
Economic Freedom
Education for Life
Enterpreneurship
Environment
Freedom of Expression
Freedom to Trade
Globalization for the Good
Health is Wealth
Intellectual Property Rights
International Relations
Liberty is Security
Limited Government
Principles of Politics
Privatisation
Population - the ultimate resource
Property Rights
Regulatory Affairs
Rule of Law
Tax Freedom
Facts & Figures
Opportunities
Competitions
 Freedom to Trade
 
Stealth Protectionism
Independent Institute, United States Wednesday, November 10, 2010

Alvaro Vargas Llosa
Most world leaders reject the idea that protectionism would be an appropriate response to the financial crisis which happened three years back.The United States, however, has adopted a protectionist policy by devaluing the currency. The federal reserve is urging people o consume more by creating money out of thin air. It hasn't worked in the way it was supposed to work, writes Alvaro Vargas Llosa in Independent Institute Newsroom.

WASHINGTON—We have heard every major world leader reject the notion that protectionism would be an appropriate response to the financial and economic debacle of 2007–08. And yet the signs are unmistakable: We are entering a protectionist era that does not speak its name.

Canada’s supposedly laissez-faire government has banned the purchase of Saskatchewan-based Potash Corp., by BHP Billiton, an Australian natural resources company. China has stopped shipments of so-called rare earth metals (a collection of 17 minerals used for manufacturing various products that are now in high demand) to Japan. But these and other forms of open protectionism pale in comparison to the decision by the Federal Reserve to pump another $600 billion into the economy through the purchase of government bonds.

The United States is doing what every protectionist government does—trying to make its economy competitive by devaluing the currency, a perverse mechanism for making what comes in artificially expensive and what goes out artificially cheap.

...

The Federal Reserve has been trying to get people to consume and businesses to invest by creating money out of thin air—its assets and liabilities have almost tripled since 2007. And so far the desired effect has not taken place. Convinced that no action on his part would lead to pernicious deflation and a prolonged depression, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke has decided to double down. The government is fully behind this policy, as Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and President Obama have made very clear.

The policy has not worked because the excess of debt and the unrealistic investments of the bubble years have not yet been purged from the system. It takes time and sacrifice. Deflation has little to do with this natural cleansing process. In fact, deflation is generally a good thing. The more productive an economy is, the less things cost. This is how everything from cars to computers eventually came to be affordable. Historically, productivity grew more than the money supply in the United States, so for very long periods the country experienced economic growth and declining prices.

...

It may not be so apparent, but some prices are already skyrocketing. Commodities are the obvious example. The price of gold has risen by 120 percent since early 2007 and the bulk of gold purchases are not related to buying jewelry but investing—i.e., protection from a falling dollar and the inflation that all this money printing will sooner or later generate beyond commodities. Eventually, the inflation we already see reflected in commodities will percolate to consumer products.

...

Perhaps there is one good thing about all this. Many mainstream advocates and outlets are beginning to contemplate radical change regarding money. Going back to the gold standard, getting rid of central banks or prohibiting commercial banks from lending their depositors’ money unless expressly authorized by them—as Conservatives Douglas Carswell and Steve Baker have proposed in the British Parliament—are some of the ideas now entering the international debate. The more money becomes a protectionist weapon, the more these compelling ideas will grow in stature in the eyes of the public.

This article was published in the Independent Institute on Wednesday, November 10, 2010. Please read the original article here.
Author : Mr Llosa is the Director of The Center on Global Prosperity at The Independent Institute in USA.
Tags- Find more articles on - protectionism | united states

Post your Comments on this Article

Name  
Email    
Comment  
Comments will be moderated

More Related Articles
Freedom to Trade
More Articles


 
An Initiative of
LIBERTY INSTITUTE, INDIA
All rights reserved.