Friday, February 22, 2019
About Us
Please enter your email here, we would like to keep you informed.
Connect With Us - Facebook RSS
<February 2019>
Liberty In The News
Liberty Events
Conference Proceedings
Development is the Key
Economic Freedom
Education for Life
Freedom of Expression
Freedom to Trade
Globalization for the Good
Health is Wealth
Intellectual Property Rights
International Relations
Liberty is Security
Limited Government
Principles of Politics
Population - the ultimate resource
Property Rights
Regulatory Affairs
Rule of Law
Tax Freedom
Facts & Figures
 Liberty is Security
Trivialisation of 26/11 and the war on terror
Times of India, India Monday, June 22, 2009

The political leadership in India focuses on the immediate threat by terrorists, making some fitful provisions. The larger issue of growing disorders in the region, the spectre of a failing nuclear-armed Pakistan, the terrorists' dogged pursuit of weapons of mass destruction are simply too large even to find place in the policymakers' imagination. We continue to quibble over the incremental augmentation of forces and capacities to no more than 'counter' the 'next 26/11'. The war against terrorism is a long war. But we remain abysmally unprepared, writes KPS Gill in the Times of India.

After the Mumbai 26/11 attacks, there was unprecedented public outcry provoking the resignation of the Union home minister and the dismissal of Maharashtra's chief minister. Many jumped to the conclusion that India would, finally, take effective action against terrorists and their state sponsors. An apparently inflexible diplomatic stance was adopted, demanding convincing Pakistani action against the 26/11 conspirators. The 'peace process' has since remained suspended. Pushed by western powers, Pakistan initiated reluctant steps against the Jamaat-ud-Dawa (JuD) the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) front holding some of its leaders in notional custody, and 'shutting down' a small proportion of its institutional assets. There is, however, little evidence that the organisation's operations have been undermined.


Further evidence of the trivialisation of 26/11 in Pakistan was provided by the Lahore high court's orders to release Hafiz Mohammad Saeed, head of the LeT/JuD. Islamabad promises to contest the court's order, but this is just part of an old charade. The man will be 'arrested' again, to be held in honourable custody, an entirely unconvincing case will be presented by the prosecution and the court will, again, order his release. Eventually, the international outcry will be sufficiently mild to make the release stick or the farce will simply go through another cycle.



At the same time, establishment Islamists in Pakistan accuse India of being obstructive, arguing that the resumption of the peace process cannot be linked to the Mumbai carnage which was in any case "a very small event", and that Pakistan has "suffered bigger incidents of terror".



The trivialisation of 26/11 doesn't end with Pakistan. In India, statements by top leaders suggest that New Delhi is simply waiting for minimal compliance to get back to the 'peace process'. Vilasrao Deshmukh's elevation to the Union cabinet demonstrates that 26/11 has faded into irrelevance. He was asked to relinquish his post after the 26/11 debacle and the disgraceful 'terror tourism' incident, when he took his actor son and another film personality around the devastated Taj Hotel.



For the chattering classes, terrorism is titillation, something to discuss breathlessly at parties. Few understand the sheer horror and dehumanisation that terrorists inflict; fewer still are aware of the tremendous capacities that are at risk of falling into the hands of the most unscrupulous enemy India could imagine.


This is the gravest risk of the trivialisation of 26/11: the trivialisation of the enveloping threats that confront India. At best, the political leadership focuses on the immediate threat, making some fitful provisions for augmented security. The larger issue of growing disorders in the region, the spectre of a failing nuclear-armed Pakistan, the terrorists' dogged pursuit of weapons of mass destruction all these are simply too large even to find place in the policymakers' imagination. Pakistani defence analyst Pervez Hoodbhoy remarks, "Nuclear affairs are now being guided by wishful, delusional thinking. The most frighte

This article was published in the Times of India on Monday, June 22, 2009. Please read the original article here.
Author :
Tags- Find more articles on - Islamic Fundamentalism | Pakistan | terror attacks | terrorism

Post your Comments on this Article

Comments will be moderated

More Related Articles
Liberty is Security
More Articles

An Initiative of
All rights reserved.